Proses Peer Review
Peer Review Process
The VORTEKS journal has a two-stage review process.
The first stage is an initial editorial review (also known as Desktop Review, Screening Review) by one of the section editors or editor-in-chief, which results in a decision to submit to peer review (stage 2) or editorial rejection.
If the paper advances to stage 2, a Section Editor will be assigned to manage the review process. Here, two members of the VORTEKS Journal review panel will be assigned to review the paper. Our review panel consists of researchers and practitioners drawn from section editors and other experienced researchers. Reviewers selected to review articles are selected based on their experience, expertise, and interests that align with the focus of the article.
The VORTEKS journal uses a single blind review process. In it, the reviewer knows the identity of the author, but the author does not know the identity of the reviewer. No direct communication is permitted between reviewers and authors.
Articles will be reviewed based on the following criteria:
- Contribution to advancing Engineering knowledge
- Quality of critical engagement with relevant literature (literature review and discussion)
- Clarity of research and/or development objectives
- Clarity and justification of appropriate methodology
- Quality of empirical data, analysis, presentation and interpretation of results
- Inclusion of appropriate implications for further research, theory, practice, and/or policy.
- Quality of writing (including structure, writing style, clarity of expression
The editor should notify you of the review results as soon as possible, hopefully within 30 to 60 days.
Editors will run a plagiarism check using Turnitin on submitted articles before sending them to reviewers. We do not process plagiarized content. If an article has more than 25% plagiarism based on the inspection results, the article will be rejected. This journal was carried out using Mendeley as a Reference Manager Tool. The language used in this journal is English.
Accepted research articles will be available online (free download) after the journal's peer-review process. The final decision on article acceptance will be made by the Editor in accordance with the Reviewer's comments. Articles sent back to the author for revision must be returned to the editor without delay. Revised articles returned within 20 days will be considered new submissions. Revised articles can be submitted to editorial via the Online Submission Interface on our online Journal website.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We continue to work with our author community to select the best choice of licensing options, which is currently being defined for this journal as Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0.
Flowchart of publication: