PENYELESAIAN KEBERATAN PIHAK KETIGA YANG BERIKTIKAD BAIK TERHADAP PUTUSAN PERAMPASAN BARANG BUKAN KEPUNYAAN TERDAKWA DALAM PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI

Abstrak

Resolution of third-party good faith objections against confiscation rulings of non-defendant-owned assets in corruption cases, as regulated under Article 19(2) of Law No. 31/1999 amended by Law No. 20/2001 on Eradication of Corruption, lacks detailed procedural rules for filing and examination, leading to inconsistent judicial interpretations. This normative juridical research analyzes the objection resolution mechanism per Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) No. 2/2022 using statute, conceptual, and case approaches. Findings reveal PERMA establishes written filing within 2 months post-ruling, non-litigious examination, cassation to the Supreme Court, and execution via asset return or compensation. The regulation supplements statutory gaps without halting confiscation execution. Conclusion: PERMA No. 2/2022 effectively fills procedural voids in anti-corruption law; recommendation includes court-led socialization to enhance public awareness.