Analysis of the Implementation Budget Plan (RAP) and Comparison of the Cost Budget Plan (RAB) for the Construction of Type 48 Houses in Bumi Mentaya Residence, East Kotawaringin

Abstract

From The research on Type 48 housing aims to analyze the comparison between the Cost Budget Plan (RAB) and the Implementation Budget Plan (RAP). The implementation in this study uses the Unit Price Analysis Method (AHSP), which helps identify the difference in total costs between RAB and RAP, primarily resulting from the number of laborers on site.  Data collection methods include both primary and secondary data. The primary data types used in this study are as follows:  a) Working Drawings or Design Plans b) Work Volume  c) Unit Price Analysis (AHSP)  d) Fund Recapitulation  e) Observations  f) Interviews.  The secondary data used to support this research includes:  a) Cost Budget Plan (RAB)  b) Unit Prices of Goods and Services (SHBJ) of East Kotawaringin Regency  c) Work Plan and Specifications (RKS).  The Cost Budget Plan (RAB) for the Bumi Mentaya Residence housing development project is valued at Rp. 216,063,000, while the Implementation Budget Plan (RAP) is valued at Rp. 159,265,000. Therefore, the difference between the two budgets is Rp. 56,798,000, with a percentage level of 73%, which aligns with the acceptable range for RAP, typically between 65% and 75% of the total RAB cost